LegalTips.ORG Directory Full Text About us
Alabama Code | California Code | Connecticut Code | Nebraska Code | Texas Code
 
Google
 
Web LegalTips.org


maritime & jones injury law attorney   Official Government Sites
   State of Alabama
   State of Alaska
   State of Arizona
   State of Arkansas
   State of California
   State of Colorado
   State of Connecticut
   State of Delaware
   District-of-Columbia
   State of Florida
   State of Georgia
   State of Hawaii
   State of Idaho
   State of Illinois
   State of Indiana
   State of Iowa
   State of Kansas
   State of Kentucky
   State of Louisiana
   State of Maine
   State of Maryland
   State of Massachusetts
   State of Michigan
   State of Minnesota
   State of Mississippi
   State of Missouri
   State of Montana
   State of Nebraska
   State of Nevada
   State of New-Hampshire
   State of New-Jersey
   State of New-Mexico
   State of New York
   State of North-Carolina
   State of North-Dakota
   State of Ohio
   State of Oklahoma
   State of Oregon
   State of Pennsylvania
   State of Rhode-Island
   State of South-Carolina
   State of South-Dakota
   State of Tennessee
   State of Texas
   State of Utah
   State of Vermont
   State of Virginia
   State of Washington
   State of West-Virginia
   State of Wisconsin
   State of Wyoming

Section 30-3B-207

Inconvenient forum.

(a) A court of this state which has jurisdiction under this chapter to make a child custody determination may decline to exercise its jurisdiction at any time if it determines that it is an inconvenient forum under the circumstances and that a court of another state is a more appropriate forum. The issue of inconvenient forum may be raised upon the motion of a party, the court's own motion, or request of another court.

(b) Before determining whether it is an inconvenient forum, a court of this state shall consider whether it is appropriate for a court of another state to exercise jurisdiction. For this purpose, the court shall allow the parties to submit information and shall consider all relevant factors, including:

(1) Whether domestic violence has occurred and is likely to continue in the future and which state could best protect the parties and the child;

(2) The length of time the child has resided outside this state;

(3) The distance between the court in this state and the court in the state that would assume jurisdiction;

(4) The relative financial circumstances of the parties;

(5) Any agreement of the parties as to which state should assume jurisdiction;

(6) The nature and location of the evidence required to resolve the pending litigation, including testimony of the child;

(7) The ability of the court of each state to decide the issue expeditiously and the procedures necessary to present the evidence; and

(8) The familiarity of the court of each state with the facts and issues in the pending litigation.

(c) If a court of this state determines that it is an inconvenient forum and that a court of another state is a more appropriate forum, it shall stay the proceedings upon condition that a child custody proceeding be promptly commenced in another designated state and may impose any other condition the court considers just and proper.

(d) A court of this state may decline to exercise its jurisdiction under this chapter if a child custody determination is incidental to an action for divorce or another proceeding while still retaining jurisdiction over the divorce or other proceeding.

(Act 99-438, p. 886, §1.)



Alabama Code | California Code | Connecticut Code | Nebraska Code | Texas Code
 © 2007 All Rights Reserved. LegalTips.ORG.